Brent Council resorting to dirty tricks as embarrassment looms?
Guest blog by E.TribunalThe prospect of seeing Rosemarie Clarke being presented with the Brent Staff Achievement Award 2014 by her colleagues Cara Davani and Christine Gilbert is one which has moved a large number of people to register their knowledge and appreciation of this strong and resolute lady by nominating her here LINK
It’s crucial that this momentum is kept up in the last 2 days before nominations close, however. So could I ask everyone who hasn’t already done so to nominate Rosemarie and for as many people as possible to urge others to nominate her before the deadline of October 16th?
We need the maximum nomination for Rosemarie as we can expect some dirty tricks from Butt/Gilbert/Davani/Ledden as they attempt to wriggle out of the inevitable popular result. Following the example of Jed Bush ( Bush’s brother in Florida who fiddled the vote to make him president), they may claim that only either ‘Rosemarie’ with an ‘ie’ or with a ‘y’ should count. Nonsense. We know and they know who we’re nominating.
They may claim that she resigned from Brent Council and is no longer eligible. Nonsense. As the Tribunal judge established, their bullying, victimisation and racial discrimination amounted to constructive dismissal, so their illegal treatment of Rosemarie forced her resignation. ( A point they inadvertently acknowledged by insisting on continuing their disciplinary even after forcing her resignation).
There are rumours that they have organised a counter-campaign by selecting their own nominee and getting people to vote for him/her in order to outvote Rosemarie. This is always possible. It’s also possible, I suppose, that the nominee they’ve chosen to select is Ms Davani herself. Could it be (see Martin’s post today) that this is why it’s been announced that she is now actually on the Brent payroll, in order to make her eligible?
Will they be able to find enough people to support their plan? Or is Brent Council about to receive hundreds of nomination forms for Ms Davani with only a paw-mark where the nominator’s name should be?
Will it be noticed that the majority of these votes come from the same addresses, addresses which do not tally with the official register of the names of dogs residing at that address and where the actual resident mutt has no knowledge that their identity has been fraudulently used?
Will the police again show no interest in getting involved in a blatant case of identity theft ?
Whatever the truth, we can all be confident that Wembley Matters will get it to us first.
Whatever the truth, we can all be confident that Wembley Matters will get it to us first.
MEANWHILE, PLEASE NOMINATE ROSEMARIE AND DO ALL YOU CAN TO CONVINCE OTHERS TO DO THE SAME