As readers will know Christine Gilbert and Cara Davani have proposed a restructuring of senior management of Brent Council that some have seemed as part of a 'jobs for the boys and girls' strategy. Details can be found here: LINK
The details were to be discussed at the General Purposes Committee but no details were published on the Agenda. It was marked restricted as individuals could be identified before consultation began. One person who may be affected is Fiona Ledden, Director of Legal and Procurement, as it was proposed that her post be deleted.
At the meeting the item was taken 'below the line' (confidential) and a backbench Labour councillor was none too happy at being excluded from the room.
Now the issue has been taken up by Paul Lorber, former leader of the Liberal Democrats and previously Leader of the Council.
He pressed the case for open government in an exchange with Fiona Ledden:
The details were to be discussed at the General Purposes Committee but no details were published on the Agenda. It was marked restricted as individuals could be identified before consultation began. One person who may be affected is Fiona Ledden, Director of Legal and Procurement, as it was proposed that her post be deleted.
At the meeting the item was taken 'below the line' (confidential) and a backbench Labour councillor was none too happy at being excluded from the room.
Now the issue has been taken up by Paul Lorber, former leader of the Liberal Democrats and previously Leader of the Council.
He pressed the case for open government in an exchange with Fiona Ledden:
To: Ledden, Fiona
Cc: Gilbert, Christine Subject: GP Report on Restructuring etc
Fiona
Can you please supply me with a copy of this Report as I believe that aspects of it should NOT have been kept secret .
Brent supports the concept if a Freedom Of Information and Reports dealing with the abolition of Departments and posts themselves have not in the past been treated as confidential.
Only matters which are confidential are issues specific to individual employees.
The normal practice in the past has been a Report above the line dealing with the general issues and only the specific staff related issues should be kept below the line .
Can you please explain who made the decision to restrict all the information to just the Members of the GP Committee and why were other Councillors excluded from Meeting and prevented from being present during consideration of the items.
How does any of this meet the acceptable Freedom of Information undertakings? Has there been a decision to raise the Secrecy threshold under the current Administration?
I would appreciate an early reply.
Thanks
Paul
Dear Paul,
The report was below the line and will always remain below the line I can not therefore provide you with a copy.
The consideration of whether the report should go below the line took into account the relevant information.
Kind regards
Fiona
Fiona Ledden
Director of Legal and Procurement
Fiona
Sorry but this is not an acceptable answer. What 'consideration' - absolute secrecy to hide what officers recommend even if breach of Open Government undertakings?
On what basis were Councillors expelled from the meeting of the GP and thus denied an opportunity to Scrutinise. Are you using GP Committee to by pass information and decision making of full Council or even the Cabinet?
This is clearly an abuse and not what was expected of the Cabinet and Scrutiny System. Perhaps you and your colleagues need to review both the legislation and Brent Council policy on Open Government and act accordingly.
Please advise how this decision can be scrutinised if access to the papers is denied to Councillors let alone the public.
Please treat my email as a formal Complaint against a refusal to provide me with information I am entitled to as a local resident and Council Tax payer.
Regards
Paul