Guest blog by Ray Singh-Standids
If Copland was judged to be ‘failing’ at a 5 GCSE rate of 46%, what does that make Ark Academies’ effort of 31% only 2 years later? Ark would no doubt blame the 31% results on Copland’s teaching in earlier years. But that doesn’t stand up as Copland’s 46% was achieved in those exact same circumstances (arguably worse circumstances, in fact, as Copland’s 46% students hadn’t had the benefit of Ark Academies’ claimed excellence at ‘driving up standards’).
In 2014 Copland School was taken out of local authority control and forced to become an academy. The reason given was that Copland, (a school whose staff and students had suffered a unique period of mismanagement and corruption which resulted in the sacking of the governing body and criminal charges against the headteacher and his management team), was judged to be a ‘failing school’. The consequence of this judgement was forced academisation, a move which parents, staff and students voted against but which Cllrs Pavey and Butt publicly supported.
In 2014, Copland’s last year, 46% of students obtained 5 GCSE subjects including English and Mathsat grades A*-C . This followed improvements of 3 percentage points for each of the previous 2 years despite this being a period in which senior management was helping the police with their enquiries and Ofsted inspectors and other nuisances constantly cluttered up the classrooms hampering the continuity and flow of the educational experience of staff and students.
Copland was forced to become Ark Elvin Academy in September 2014. By the end of Ark Elvin’s first year the headline 5 GCSE figure had dropped from 46% to 36%. For 2016 the figure is apparently an even more dismal 31%. Those figures again:
2012 Copland School 5 A*-C inc English and Maths 40%
2013 Copland School 5 A*-C inc English and Maths 43%
2014 Copland School 5 A*-C inc English and Maths 46%
2015 Ark Elvin Academy 5 A*-C inc English and Maths 36%
2016 Ark Elvin Academy 5 A*-C inc English and Maths 31%
If Copland was judged to be ‘failing’ at a 5 GCSE rate of 46%, what does that make Ark Academies’ effort of 31% only 2 years later? Ark would no doubt blame the 31% results on Copland’s teaching in earlier years. But that doesn’t stand up as Copland’s 46% was achieved in those exact same circumstances (arguably worse circumstances, in fact, as Copland’s 46% students hadn’t had the benefit of Ark Academies’ claimed excellence at ‘driving up standards’).
So, what’s to be done, Cllrs Pavey and Butt must surely be asking themselves. When comprehensives ‘fail’ they’re forced to become academies, (with your enthusiastic support, Cllrs Butt and Pavey). But Ark Elvin already is an academy. So when an academy ‘fails’ you’ve got a problem. Do you turn it back into a local authority comprehensive? Not allowed, I’m afraid. But don’t worry, Cllrs, the Tories have come up with another wheeze to help you out. Theresa May has said she’s going to bring back grammar schools (for the very small percentage who pass the 11 plus exam). But for every one grammar school she brings back, (though she hasn’t said this), she’ll have to bring back three secondary modern schools for the very large percentage who fail the 11 plus. And that’s where Ark Elvin comes in. Those sharp hedge fund billionaires who run Ark Academies Inc know a business opportunity when they see one and are probably already making plans for this one. Expect the Ark Secondary Moderns ‘charity’ to be announced within weeks with Ark Elvin as the flagship model (after due consultation, of course) .Problem solved. Tories to the rescue again, just like last time! And don’t worry, Cllrs Butt and Pavey. You liked forced academisation so you’re going to love forced secondary modernisation! Magna Aude! (Or Big German Car as we’ll probably have to change the motto to for the sake of those secondary modern duffers).