 |
| Brent Council 2002 |
I have received the following Anonymous guest blog in reaction to the lead members' Q&As published earlier LINK:
I read your blog about the forthcoming Full Council Meeting with intrigue, particularly the question “1. Question from Mr Wadhwani to Councillor Tatler, Lead Member for Regeneration, Growth, Employment and Skills:” and the fantastical answer given by Councillor Tatler. I have added a few follow up questions that should now be asked.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “The Council takes a plan-led approach to the regeneration of the borough, in order to prevent development schemes coming forward in an ad hoc, unplanned fashion.”
Additional Questions: The public consensus is that they have failed miserably in their task, even the Daily Mail agree.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “Wembley has a comprehensive planning framework, including the dedicated Wembley Area Action Plan (adopted 2015), which sets out how development of the area will progress”.
Additional Questions: That may be true, but it is a shame it has produced such an unqualified mess, just ask residents and the Daily Mail. The planning process has created a shambolic development becoming know as Rent City where there is no community, just a never ending churn of unknowns.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “The ongoing regeneration provides and plans for infrastructure and facilities to support current and future residents across the Wembley area, including: A 7 hectare public park”.
Additional Questions: Where is this then? Not another paved concourse with token raised planters and a few sapling trees, I hope.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “New 3 form entry primary school, including a 2 form entry nursery school, plus 2 additional forms of nursery provision”.
Additional Questions: Where abouts are these then?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “Primary health care facility (1500m minimum)”.
Additional Questions: According to the Brent Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) at a recent meeting in public, this facility was turned down by the Council and is now used as a Gym. If untrue, where is the Primary Health Care Facility?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “ Contributions towards secondary education in the wider area”.
Additional Questions: Details please? How much? Aren’t all Brent Secondary Schools academies? Aren’t academies funded directly by the DoE!!!
Cllr. Tatler Response: “6-lane 25m swimming pool available at local authority facility rates”.
Additional Questions: Where is this located then??
Cllr. Tatler Response: “Significant investment in and improvement to the main rail and underground - stations to improve capacity and the environment”.
Additional Questions: Details please? or is this the £17million of CIL the Council are going to spend to improve the Quintain Development Area? This includes Olympic Way? where the Stadium ramps will be replaced by stairs (no doubt to fit another tower block or two?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “Community facility fund of £1.4m plus to spend on community projects”.
Additional Questions: Isn’t this money being spent across the Borough so has nothing to do with the question asked?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “Physical transport improvements e.g. the Triangle, Wembley High Road”.
Additional Questions: Example please? The roads around the Triangle are normally at a standstill which delays the buses and other vehicles alike. Queues regularly form all the way back to Forty Lane.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “and elsewhere, together with significant developer contributions to Transport for London (TfL) for public transport, including buses”.
Additional Questions: What are these?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “Developers have additionally contributed a significant cash sum of Community Infrastructure Levy”.
Additional Questions: What are the council spending this money on? How much money excluding the CIL spent on items above? How much is in this cash pot?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “part of which will be spent on neighbourhood projects”
Additional Questions: This money is not being spent in the Regeneration/Development areas, it is being spread across the Borough so has nothing to do with the question asked.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “and the remainder on strategic infrastructure needs to support growth in the immediate Wembley area and wider Brent Borough”.
Additional Questions: What is it going to be? Does the Council have any idea?
Cllr. Tatler Response: “The Local Plan and in particular the Wembley Area Action Plan sets out the regeneration and development strategy for the Wembley area”.
Additional Questions: You wouldn’t have known it, is the current public consensus.
Cllr. Tatler Response: “The Local Plan is now to be refreshed and to examine how the whole Borough will develop over the next 15-20 years” .
term, so what hope have they in planning for the next 15-20 years? Is this new plan as advised by officers implying Metroland developments with their large gardens are being targeted for redeveloped into high density housing?
Cllr. Tatler Response: "Everyone is invited to get involved in this exercise and various public sessions are being held across the Borough throughout September for people to come along and contribute" .
Additional Questions: The Council CONSULT but do not LISTEN , and they certainly DON'T consider the views of residents or any criticism from these groups. How will this be different?